Mother once gave me a lecture on politeness which included the phrase, “It’s very rude to point your finger at someone.” Apparently, those who are the copy writers for political ads and those candidates who conclude them by saying, “I’m So and So and I approve this message,” never got the same talking to from their own parents. More’s the pity.
When people brought Barack Obama into the White House in 2008 it was on a theme of “Hope and Change”. Things were tough. We knew they were tough. The newly elected President campaigned on the theme that while things were tough, he was going to fix all that.
Simply put, he didn’t. In fact, by many metrics, those things that were tough have gotten even tougher. The current mantra of the President’s ads is that things are actually getting better; that he has a plan which needs time to work; and that we should stick with him for another term. It is an ad featuring a far less confrontational Obama than we have seen during the last four years.
Much of the hyperbole about why things are tough and it’s going to take longer than he thought to get everything working again, is his predecessor, President George W. Bush. Apparently, virtually everything that has gone awry in the universe since the Big Bang is the fault of this misanthrope from Texas. But let’s examine the facts for a moment – that is for those of you who think that facts matter.
Yesterday the Bureau of Labor Statistics provided the Unemployment Report for September. It showed that from the previous month, the rate of unemployment went from 7.8% to 7.9%. I have attached the link to this report for you to review. No matter how we garner our information, I believe that it is essential for the intelligent individual to do her or his own research and make sure that the sources on which they are relying are honest and factual. That is one of the reasons I seldom listen to the popular media for my news.
There are two items on the report that leap off the page at me. The first is then candidate Obama’s claim that he would bring unemployment down to a mere 5.2%. There is only one state in which that is the case, Iowa which can boast the lowest unemployment rate in the country with only 5.2%.
I guess that there a lot of ways that you can spin this – and which all the President’s men will spin it – if they choose to acknowledge it at all. But my take on this is that for those residents of 49 of the 50 states, Obama has failed to deliver on this specific promise. Because I always like to hear alternative views, please feel free to leave a comment should you have a different interpretation.
The second item that appears obvious from this report is that under President Bush’s watch, 35 out of the 50 states enjoyed the lowest levels of unemployment since they started recording these statistics. Check the list out for yourself to verify this statement. And what was the average rate of unemployment in those states during those awful years while Bush was in charge? The answer – 2.91%. In other words, going from the years in which we enjoyed the lowest unemployment rates under President Bush to the current statistics under President Obama, we have seen a 271% rise in the rate of unemployment.
The President’s most recent kinder gentler ad suggests that his “plan” is working and we should just stick with him. As does another ad that is narrated by Morgan Freeman that beings, “Every President inherits challenges..”. Well, back to our old nemesis President Bush.
There is no question that President Bush’s policies gave rise to a substantial increase in the National Debt. Part of that was financing wars which he deemed in our “national interest” and part of that was accompanying those with tax reductions, best known as the “Bush tax cuts”. Every householder knows that if you reduce your income and spend more than you take in, eventually you’ll run out of money. And we have.
Sadly, President Bush was a mere novice in delivering a message of under-earning and overspending which is why under President Obama we have seen an increase in the official National Debt of $6 Trillion, a 60% increase in a mere four years to a record $16 Trillion. Part of that increase is certainly due to the tax cuts that were put in place in 2001/2003 and which are set to expire on December 31st of this year.
Did you notice the dates when those decreases were enacted? They became effective eleven years ago. Mitt Romney has argued in favor of continuing them as they currently stand on the books – at least until such the time that the economy really begins humming. This is his plan to “benefit the rich by slashing their taxes $200,000 per year” of which he is accused in almost every Obama ad. We have been living with this plan for over a decade – so I hardly think that Gov. Romney deserves either credit or opprobrium for thinking it up.
But there is a further point that I would like to make. Those who have been employed during the past decade, as a result of the Bush tax cuts, received an average additional amount of take home income of about $50 per week.
The first time your paycheck reflected this increase, do you recall either saying yourself or hearing a co-worker say, “You know, I’m kind of worried. If we keep spending more than we’re taking in, we might run into trouble six or seven years down the road.” Or did you happily accept the increase, take your wife out for a nice dinner, buy a couple of new electronic gizmos and trade up to a newer model car?
“Give the people what they want.” It’s an old political saying. And Americans want and believe we’re entitled to a lot – perhaps more than we truly deserve. It’s really a pity that when it comes to electing people who are going either to run the country or run it into the ground, we have expectations that are far lower.
And I guess that if I have to point a finger at anyone, (sorry Mom) it would be at those of us who think this is an acceptable way to run a country – or anything else.