A long time ago it was grapes. And then it was lettuce. Back in the 70’s we consumers knew how to make our voices heard. So we boycotted those commodities to bring pressure on the growers to improve the wages and conditions of the migrant farm workers.
Whether it was withholding our purchases from these products which ultimately caused the growers to increase the wages they paid their workers or some other factor I’m not sure. But at least we believed that we had helped make a difference.
if you’ve read this blog for any length of time you certainly realize that I view life through a relatively conservative set of glasses. So saying that I participated actively in the grape and lettuce boycotts might surprise you. Let me set the record straight.
No, I did not have some major catharsis which switched me from a liberal view of life to one that was more conservative in nature. Unfortunately, largely due to an extremely biased media, we have come to equate the terms conservative and uncaring as being interchangeable. Nothing could be further from the truth.
I believe that it is every person’s moral responsibility to help our fellow man out as best we can. That applies across both sexes and irrespective of race or creed. I believe and always have that we are supposed to “Do unto others…” and that we are each others’ keepers. I believe that is the message of true conservatism – however it may have been corrupted in practice or mis-stated on television.
For years I boycotted the products of Canada. Not that I have anything against our friends to the north. But I could never in my mind, after seeing several videos and the activity once in person (and that was enough) justify the slaughter of harp seal pups in front of their helpless mothers – all for the sake of human vanity. That personal encounter left me sleepless for weeks afterward.
As a conservative (and a capitalist) I thoroughly endorse the concept of consumer boycotts. If the basis of capitalism is making money, then withholding the lifeblood that sustains a company whose products we abjure, for whatever reason, seems a reasonable way to make our demands known and to instigate change on the part of the entity whom we consider an offender.
If you think about it, if we really wanted to force our lawmakers to implement a simplified and equitable tax code instead of spending generations talking about it, there is a simple way to achieve this. This next April 15, if twenty million people simply refused to file their returns it would make a statement that would awaken even the most hard of hearing in the halls of Congress. There is something to the concept of strength in numbers.
And that brings us to the topic of a boycott which is currently underway. The target is Stolichnaya which we all know is a Russian vodka. Actually, most of it that is produced for export is manufactured in Latvia (Premium Vodka) as opposed to the bottles which are produced in Russia and bear the labels (Russian Vodka).
The boycott began in gay bars in New York but have spread around the world to other such establishments because of the extremely oppressive stance that Vladimir Putin has taken regarding gays in mother Russia. It is hard for me to comprehend Comrade Putin’s position.
This is not a matter of gay marriage (that is not anywhere near being on the table in Москва). No this is simply a matter of human rights – and I would hope that people, whatever their sexual orientation, would come together solidly on the side of supporting those for everyone – including our LGBT brothers and sisters.
Perhaps the most difficult to convince in this struggle are those who self-identify as “conservatives”. I can imagine what a member of the Westboro Baptist Church might do if they were to hear someone preach a sermon on the subject. The result might be no different than the fate a gay man would expect in most of the Muslim world – death at the hands of an angry, righteous mob.
In St. Thomas Aquinas’ “Summa Contra Gentiles” he offers the following about God and His creation:
“For the virtue of a being is that by which he operates well. Now every operation of God is an operation of virtue, since His virtue is His essence, as was shown above. Therefore, God cannot will evil.”
If God cannot will evil, then certain other conclusions follow.
“ From this it appears that the hatred of something does not befit God.
 For as love is to the good, so hatred is to evil; for to those we love we will good, and to those we hate, evil. If, then, the will of God cannot be inclined to evil, as has been shown, it is impossible that He should hate anything.”
Well, the Stoli boycott has uncovered a worm in the Tequila (pardon the mixed metaphor). The Latvian gay community has appealed to their brothers and sisters to stop it – for fear that their this might upset their tenuous position in their home country. We always should be cognizant of unintended consequences when we embark on something like this. Whether their words are heeded by their brothers and sisters in the U.S., UK and Canada remains to be seen.
Let me close with a small consumer tip. I used to drink Stoli. It is good vodka. But if you want to have some excellent vodka at a fraction of the price all you need to do is the following:
Buy a charcoal-based water filter (such as a Brita). Use this filter solely for the purpose of filtering vodka – unless you want your kids walking around all day half smashed.
Instead of purchasing a premium vodka, (Stoli or Grey Goose or such), buy your vodka in the 1.75 liter size (usually around ten dollars). Gilbey’s and Gordon’s both offer a good product – among others. Run it through the filter twice, then store it in glass bottles and put it in your freezer for later consumption. You’ll be amazed at how this improves the flavor and resembles the taste of the premium vodkas that are on the market.
I know that those of you who are vodka drinkers out there will be thanking me for this advice later. But until then На здоровье! (And “chin chin” to boot).